Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42730265›Full record

ArticleHealth affairs scholar2026

Cross-country differences in household healthcare spending.

Irene Papanicolas, Jonathan Cylus, Maecey Niksch, Luca Lorenzoni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health affairs scholar, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Irene PapanicolasProfessor of Health Services, Policy and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, 121 S. Main St., Box G-S121-8, Providence, RI 02912, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8000-3185
Jonathan CylusProfessor of Health Services, Policy and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, 121 S. Main St., Box G-S121-8, Providence, RI 02912, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8269-1578
Maecey NikschProfessor of Health Services, Policy and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, 121 S. Main St., Box G-S121-8, Providence, RI 02912, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-6245-9856
Luca LorenzoniOrganization of Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris 75016, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Health systems face financial pressures as populations age and economic growth slows, with implications for who pays for health care and for what drives expenditure growth. Methods: We examined changes in outpatient and pharmaceutical care financing across OECD countries from 2000 to 2023. Results: While overall health spending growth slowed across countries after the Great Recession, household spending grew modestly everywhere, averaging about half a percentage point growth annually. The United States stood out for persistently high out-of-pocket financing burden-over twice that of most peer countries-and for price growth, rather than utilization, driving out-of-pocket spending for pharmaceutical care. Other countries saw out-of-pocket spending driven more by volume growth and slower price growth. Conclusion: These patterns highlight potential affordability pressures from out-of-pocket healthcare payments, particularly in the US Policymakers should regularly monitor financial hardship from out-of-pocket payments and reconsider using cost-sharing to address health financing sustainability challenges.

Indexed as

affordabilityfinancial hardshiphealth financingout-of-pocket healthcare payments

Identifiers

PMID42730265
PMCPMC13564218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.