ArticleHealth affairs scholar2026
Primary care physician characteristics and potentially inappropriate medications in older adults.
Article in Health affairs scholar, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) are a growing public health concern. While research in North America suggests physician characteristics were associated with PIM prescription, their generalizability to other countries remains understudied. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study using a nationwide electronic health record database of primary care clinics in Japan. We analyzed patients aged ≥75 years who visited solo-practice physicians at least quarterly during October 2022 to September 2023. Multivariable logistic regression, adjusted for patient characteristics, was used to examine the association between physician characteristics and PIM prescriptions, defined as at least one medication listed in the Screening Tool for Older Person's Appropriate Prescriptions for Japanese for ≥28 days. Results: Among 184 097 patients treated by 1532 physicians, 70 319 (38.2%) received at least one PIM. Approximately two-thirds of PIM prescriptions were concentrated among 20% of the physicians. Younger physicians (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.27; 95% CI, 1.05-1.55), physicians with lower volumes of older patients (aOR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.19-1.61), and physicians in eastern or central Japan were more likely to prescribe PIMs. Conclusions: PIM prescriptions were common and concentrated among a subset of physicians, particularly younger and less experienced physicians. Targeted interventions among high prescribers may reduce PIM efficiently.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.