ReviewJournal of oral microbiology2026
Mapping the oral microbiome in children with oral diseases using next-generation sequencing: a systematic review.
Review in Journal of oral microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedCorrection.2026
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The oral microbiome is integral to paediatric oral health and disease. Next-generation DNA sequencing (NGS) technology enables culture-independent profiling of microbial communities, yet findings remain inconsistent due to methodological and population heterogeneity. Objective: This review synthesised NGS-based evidence comparing the oral microbiome of children/adolescents with oral diseases and healthy controls. Design: The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42025618407). PubMed, Medline, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science were searched for peer-reviewed studies (2015-2025). Eligible studies used 16S rRNA gene sequencing to compare children/adolescents (0-18 years) with oral diseases and healthy controls. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data and assessed risk of bias using validated tools. Findings were synthesised narratively due to heterogeneity. Results: From 4,767 records, 61 studies were included. Most were cross-sectional designs conducted across diverse populations and conditions. Differences in community composition were more consistent than changes in alpha diversity, which varied by disease stage and sampling site. Shifts toward anaerobic, metabolically active communities were observed. Dental caries was consistently linked to acidogenic genera/species, whereas fluorosis, halitosis and gingivitis showed functional shifts involving proteolytic, sulphur-metabolising and anaerobic bacteria. Conclusion: Paediatric oral diseases are more strongly associated with condition- and niche-specific compositional alterations than with uniform diversity changes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.