ArticleForensic science international. Synergy2026
Towards an Asian registry of wrongful convictions.
Article in Forensic science international. Synergy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wrongful convictions represent a persistent yet unevenly documented problem across Asian criminal justice systems. While international research has identified common factors contributing to known wrongful convictions, systematic information about wrongful conviction cases in Asia remains fragmented and difficult to compare across jurisdictions. This fragmentation limits cross-jurisdictional learning and comparison of documented cases. This paper synthesizes existing research on contributing factors in documented wrongful conviction cases in Asia and reviews current initiatives addressing such cases. It then showcases an operational map for the Asian Registry of Wrongful Convictions (ARWC), an academic documentation platform designed to record final criminal convictions that were later officially corrected or acknowledged as erroneous. By setting out the registry's scope and finality requirement, its inclusion criteria and how they were developed, its partial harmonization strategy, documentation workflow, and feasibility, the paper offers a concrete next step toward improving transparency and comparative understanding of wrongful convictions in Asia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.