ArticlePain reports2026
Automatic quantification of thermographic images of complex regional pain syndrome using radiomics and deep learning.
Article in Pain reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a complication after trauma or surgery. Skin temperature asymmetry is one of the few symptoms that can be measured, for which thermography can be used. However, the current assessment of thermograms relies on manual interpretation and is subjective. Objective: The aim of this study was to develop an automatic model for quantitative assessment of CRPS based on thermography by using deep learning and radiomics. Methods: In this study, 178 thermograms of the extremities of 98 patients with CRPS and 837 thermograms from 56 healthy controls were included. A deep learning model was developed to segment the extremities. From each thermogram, for each extremity, 564 radiomics features were extracted. Based on these features, a classification model was developed using a combination of machine learning approaches and evaluated through a 20x random-split cross-validation. The performance of the classification model was compared with visual scoring of the thermograms by 3 clinicians. Results: The radiomics classification model statistically significantly outperformed all 3 clinicians (mean area under the curve of 0.93 compared with 0.82, 0.79, and 0.69 [ Conclusion: Our automatic classification model can distinguish thermograms of patients with CRPS from those of healthy controls with a performance that exceeds that of clinicians, thereby providing a basis for future studies evaluating its role in diagnosis and treatment monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.