ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026
Increasing the vigour and sustainability of Lei bamboo (
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The sustainable production of bamboo shoots is jeopardized by current management practices, including the use of winter mulches and the application of large quantities of nitrogen fertilizer. Many bamboo plantations exhibit premature aging and reduced shoot yields, primarily linked to oxygen deprivation in the rooting zone from mulching practices but also associated with soil acidification. The mulching is undertaken to raise soil temperatures, encouraging earlier shoot growth, but it leads to a decline in shoot production and the practice is clearly unsustainable. We examined whether the use of aeration in Lei bamboo plantations could improve the soil environment, and whether any observed soil improvements were associated with improved plant vigour. We used four field treatments (mulching without aeration, M; mulching with aeration, MA; no mulching with aeration, A; and no mulching without aeration, CK). The effects of aeration were assessed in terms of soil enzyme activity, root growth, and leaf photosynthesis. Aeration (MA and A) consistently improved key metrics compared to non-aerated treatments (M and CK). Soil enzyme activities were markedly affected: In June, catalase activities in the soils of the aerated groups (A and MA) were 22.35% and 37.25% higher, respectively, than those in non-aerated groups. Urease activities were 28.64% (A vs. CK) and 124.08% (MA vs. M) higher, respectively, and phosphatase activities were 208.80% and 131.71% higher, respectively. By October, root vitality in aerated groups was 61.90% (A vs. CK) and 142.67% (MA vs. M) higher, respectively, compared to non-aerated groups. The leaf photosynthetic rate in the A treatment was 114.48% higher than in the CK treatment and 88.31% higher in the MA treatment than in the M treatment. The results demonstrate that soil aeration leads to the more sustainable production of bamboo shoots.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.