ArticleVisual cognition2025
The guiding strength of sensory templates during preparatory stage of sustained feature-based attention.
Article in Visual cognition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Visual attention is guided by attentional templates that store task-relevant information, but whether these templates contain sensory details, and how task factors influence their content and guiding strength remains unclear. We investigated these questions by combining sustained feature-based attention with a search task containing an irrelevant distractor that either matched or mismatched the target color in the sustained attention task. The difference in attentional capture by the distractor in the same-color versus different-color condition indexed the strength of the sensory template. We manipulated selection demand by varying the similarity between the two colors in the sustained attention task and presented cues in either sensory or non-sensory formats. With sensory cues, capture magnitude remained equally strong under both low and high selection demand. However, with non-sensory cues, low selection demand attenuated but did not fully eliminate capture. These results demonstrate that attentional templates store sensory content of cued features. The guiding strength of templates is not susceptible to selection demand with sensory cues, but non-sensory cues delayed or reduced the activation and maintenance of sensory templates under low selection demand. This suggests that cue format and selection demand contribute to how sensory information is represented in attentional templates to guide selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.