ArticleACS omega2026
Impact of the Composition of Cosmetic Formulations on the Skin Barrier and Film-Forming Potential of a Skin-Protective Biopolymer.
Article in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Air pollution-associated skin damage has increased interest in cosmetic strategies that support skin barrier function. However, the performance of film-forming properties biopolymers can be influenced by cosmetic formulation composition. In this context, this study aimed to develop and characterize gel and gel-cream formulations with or without 1% of tara and red algae-derived biopolymer. These formulations were evaluated for rheological, texture profile, sensory properties, and short-term clinical efficacy. All formulations remained stable for 28 days, with pH values between 5.0 and 5.5. The addition of biopolymer in the formulations was associated with lower consistency index values, from 79.6 ± 1.4 to 46.9 ± 0.7 in gels and from 192.1 ± 1.1 to 156.1 ± 0.9 in gel-creams. Firmness, consistency, and viscosity index were also lower in the formations added with biopolymer. The work of shear parameter was not significantly changed and biopolymer did not alter the sensory properties of the formulations. In the short term clinical efficacy study, significant increases in stratum corneum water content and reductions in transepidermal water loss were observed at 1 h for the gel containing the biopolymer and at 2 h for the gel-cream containing the biopolymer (
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.