ArticleInternational journal of integrated care
Patients' Experiences of the Western HealthLinks Integrated Care Chronic Illness Management Program: A Prospective Mixed-Methods Observational Cohort Study.
Article in International journal of integrated care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Western HealthLinks, an integrated care chronic illness management program, supported patients with chronic and complex conditions to stay well at home after hospital discharge. This study assessed patients' experiences of the program. Methods: A prospective mixed-methods observational cohort study, conducted as an implementation evaluation with six-monthly assessments over 30 months included: A visual analogue scale (VAS) rating healthcare satisfaction; an Assessment of Quality of Life 4 Dimensions (AQoL4D) tool; a survey regarding healthcare satisfaction. VAS and AQoL4D were analysed with a simple random effects model using time as a linear variable; survey was analysed with thematic analysis. Results: Median baseline VAS was 79 and AQoL4D 0.15, with no evidence for change over time. Themes across timepoints included: Local/home-based care; hospital access; individualised, coordinated and consistent care; communication; reduced waiting; healthcare provider qualities; transport/parking. Discussion: No evidence of change to VAS and AQoL4D suggests maintained healthcare satisfaction and QoL over time despite increasing age and disease burden. Surveys showed patients value integrated care. Limitations include the absence of control group and loss to follow-up with risk of bias for VAS and AQoL4D. Conclusion: Western HealthLinks patients maintained healthcare satisfaction and QoL over time after hospital discharge. Patients value integrated care and future models of care may benefit from incorporation of themes from analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.