Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42730052›Full record

ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2026

Sources of the N15 TMS-evoked potential following motor cortex stimulation localize rostrals to TMS-induced electric fields and depend on dose.

Sybren Van Hoornweder, Mikkel M Beck, Jesper D Nielsen, Leo Tomasevic, Raf L J Meesen, Hartwig R Siebner, Axel Thielscher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sybren Van HoornwederDanish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Centre for Functional and Diagnostic Imaging and Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0325-8950
Mikkel M BeckDanish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Centre for Functional and Diagnostic Imaging and Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Jesper D NielsenDanish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Centre for Functional and Diagnostic Imaging and Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Leo TomasevicDanish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Centre for Functional and Diagnostic Imaging and Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Raf L J MeesenREVAL - Rehabilitation Research Center, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Hasselt, Diepenbeek, Belgium.
Hartwig R SiebnerDanish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Centre for Functional and Diagnostic Imaging and Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Axel ThielscherDanish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Centre for Functional and Diagnostic Imaging and Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) elicits characteristic cortical responses known as TMS-evoked potentials (TEPs) measured via electroencephalography (EEG). An early negative peak can be consistently evoked over the motor cortex at around 15 ms (N15). It remains elusive whether N15 overlaps with the cortical regions receiving the highest TMS-induced electric field (E-field). We characterized the source activity of the N15 component relative to the TMS-induced E-field in 16 healthy adults who underwent TMS-EEG over the left primary motor hand area at six stimulus intensities (-8% to +12% maximum stimulator output relative to resting motor threshold) during rest and tonic contraction. Individualized head models, based on T1 and T2 MRI scans, were used for E-field simulations and source localization with LCMV, dSPM, and eLORETA as inverse solvers. Linear mixed-effects models and spatial clustering were used to assess dose- and state-dependent effects. The N15 source field was consistently located rostral to the TMS-induced electric field, with the spatial disparity decreasing as the stimulation dose increased. N15 source activity primarily clustered in the left premotor and primary motor cortex, while the TMS E-field peaked in the crowns of the pre- and postcentral gyri. All three inverse solvers yielded similar results, demonstrating consistent dose- and state-dependent effects on the N15 and suggesting that solver choice had minimal impact. These findings demonstrate a spatial mismatch between early TMS-evoked potentials following motor cortex stimulation and the cortical regions exposed to peak electric fields. Combined with prior literature, our findings provide evidence that the rostral N15 source activity reflects transsynaptic propagation via direct cortico-cortical or indirect cortico-subcortico-cortical pathways.

Indexed as

Evoked Potentials, MotorMotor CortexTranscranial Magnetic StimulationAdultBrain MappingElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleYoung AdultdoseEEGelectric fieldsN15source modelingstateTEPTMS

Identifiers

PMID42730052
PMCPMC13563533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.