ArticlePulmonary circulation2026
Quality of Pulmonary Hypertension Care Within Expert PH Centers: Patient and Provider Perspectives From a Multi-Site Qualitative Study.
Article in Pulmonary circulation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a progressive disease associated with high morbidity and mortality. Despite advancements, gaps in PH care quality persist, though the drivers of these gaps are incompletely understood. Thus, we sought to explore patient and provider perspectives on high-quality PH care. We conducted a multi-site qualitative study at three expert PH centers in the United States, involving telephone interviews with 20 providers and 22 patients. We conducted a reflexive thematic analysis, using the Institute of Medicine's (IOM) six domains of healthcare quality (safe, effective, patient-centered, timely, efficient, and equitable) as an a priori coding scheme, with subcodes developed under each domain. We then compared codes across IOM domains and patient and provider data to identify overarching themes. Our analysis revealed three cross-cutting themes that encompassed all six IOM healthcare quality domains, covered all identified subcodes, and represented both provider and patient perspectives: (1) "It takes a village," that is, the expansive team needed to provide care for a patient with PH; (2) The need for care coordination within a PH center, with specialty pharmacies, and with community providers; and (3) PH centers as a model to deliver high-quality care. Finally, participants offered clear recommendations for addressing gaps in care quality, including expanding village members, such as the addition of social workers, improving care coordination by improving patient follow-up and tracking, and expanding access to PH centers by having a PH center presence in the community. These findings highlight key areas for targeted improvements in PH care quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.