ArticleJournal of chemical education2026
Revisiting a Common Cobalt Chloride Equilibrium Experiment with Generative Artificial Intelligence.
Article in Journal of chemical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We have developed and implemented a first-year undergraduate laboratory experiment at St. Bonaventure University that augments a well-established thermodynamics lab on the spectrophotometric determination of the equilibrium of cobalt-(II) chloride hexahydrate with generative artificial intelligence (GenAI). Students utilized the aggregate of their own knowledge, peer discussion, instructor guidance, and free ChatGPT accounts in their analysis of laboratory data to iteratively refine their answers to chemical questions. Overall, the inclusion of GenAI in student workflow did not appear to negatively impact student performance, but there were instances where it struggled to produce correct answers for tasks. Descriptive analysis of student responses, chat logs, and instructor discussions suggests that most students improved their final answers despite potential shortcomings in GenAI responses. However, the analysis additionally identified multiple areas which could be improved in future iterations of this work. This laboratory experiment is designed such that it can be easily adopted by faculty with an interest in exploring the use of GenAI in chemistry curricula. In future work we intend to adapt the iterative framework and Sankey Flow diagrams employed in this work to design assessments which can disentangle the influence of peers, instructors, and GenAI on students' work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.