ArticleCHEST pulmonary2026
Impact of COPD on Lung Cancer Screening Positivity in a Specialist-Managed Cohort From Brazil.
Article in CHEST pulmonary, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Individuals with COPD are frequently included in low-dose CT (LDCT) lung cancer screening programs because eligibility criteria are typically based on smoking exposure and age. However, the impact of COPD on LDCT scan results remains incompletely understood and has been little studied among patients under follow-up for chronic respiratory diseases and in middle-income countries. Research Question: What is the association between COPD-using different definitions-and positive LDCT screening results in a cohort of patients with chronic, stable respiratory diseases in Brazil? Study Design and Methods: This cross-sectional analysis included patients who underwent lung cancer screening at a tertiary hospital and met US Preventive Services Task Force eligibility criteria. Clinical, pulmonary function, and imaging data were retrospectively collected. COPD was defined as follows: (1) physician-diagnosed COPD, (2) airflow obstruction (FEV Results: Of the 1,337 screened patients, 1,034 (77%) met US Preventive Services Task Force eligibility criteria and had available data for analysis (mean age, 63.6 years; 53.2% female; mean FEV Interpretation: These findings suggest that emphysema may be the COPD-related feature most strongly linked to screening positivity in this high-respiratory morbidity setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.