ArticleFrontiers in neurology2026
Predicting long-term outcomes in intracerebral hemorrhage: a comparative study of machine learning models highlights the prognostic value of hematoma clearance.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to develop and internally validate postoperative prognostic models for long-term functional outcomes in patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) following hematoma evacuation, and to compare the performance of traditional logistic regression (LR) with machine learning (ML) algorithms in a limited sample size setting. Methods: A retrospective cohort of 185 ICH patients who underwent stereotactic surgery was analyzed. Four key predictors-age, admission Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, ICH grade, and hematoma clearance ratio-were selected using Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression. Predictive models were constructed using LR and multiple ML algorithms (Gaussian Naïve Bayes (GNB), Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), Random Forest (RF), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost)). Model performance was evaluated using area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and other metrics. Results: Hematoma clearance ratio was associated with 6- and 12-month outcomes. The Youden index suggested a threshold of 67.3%, whereas RCS analysis indicated an exploratory cut point near 81%; therefore, the 81% value should be considered hypothesis-generating. LR demonstrated internally validated performance comparable to the evaluated ML models in small-sample settings. Older age, higher ICH grade, and lower GCS were associated with a lower probability of favorable outcomes. Conclusion: In this single-center retrospective cohort, the hematoma clearance ratio was associated with long-term functional recovery after ICH surgery. LR provided performance comparable to the evaluated ML models and may serve as an interpretable research model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.