ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Characteristics, risk factors, prevention and nursing measures of medical device-related pressure injuries in critically ill patients: a scoping review.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Studies on medical device-related pressure injuries (MDRPIs) in critically ill patients still face some nonnegligible challenges, impeding the development and implementation of evidence-based interventions. Objectives: The purpose of this review is to investigate MDRPIs in critically ill patients, from the aspects of characteristics, risk factors, prevention and nursing measures, to improve high-quality assessment, treatment, and management of critically ill patients with MDRPIs. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted across major electronic databases to identify relevant studies. In addition, the websites and materials from relevant associations, professional organizations, and official departments were also searched for further information. Necessary manual search for references of the retrieved articles was performed to capture potential eligible studies. Two reviewers independently conducted study selection based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and then data extraction was carried out by using a pre-designed form. A comprehensive summary of the findings from the final included studies in relation to MDRPIs in critically ill patients was achieved through narrative data synthesis. Results: Eighteen articles were finally included, which were conducted in Brazil, Australia, New Zealand, Turkey, Norway, Jordan, and China, respectively, covering 15,341 critically ill patients. Various medical devices are responsible for MDRPIs in critically ill patients, mainly including endotracheal/orotracheal/nasotracheal intubation tubes. The most commonly affected anatomical locations involving the nose/nasal mucosa, mouth, lips, and ear. The MDRPIs in critically ill patients are caused by the interaction of multiple factors, which can be generally classified into three categories: medical devices, patient-specific factors, and treatment- and care-related factors. Correspondingly, the synthesized preventative and nursing measures were also categorized into the abovementioned three categories. Conclusion: MDRPIs exhibit device-dependent injury characteristics, with risk factors involving multi-dimensional interactions among medical devices, patients, and treatment and care procedures. Risk assessment, device optimization, positioning management, and skin care are core interventions for the occurrence of MDRPIs in critically ill patients. In order to provide safe and effective treatment and care services for critically ill patients, the prevention and control of MDRPIs should be guided by existing evidence, integrate innovative technologies and practical wisdom, improve the professional competence of medical staff, and enhance multidisciplinary collaboration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.