ArticleUpsala journal of medical sciences2026
Sex differences in monitoring and achievement of blood pressure and LDL-cholesterol targets in chronic coronary syndrome.
Article in Upsala journal of medical sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The cornerstones of secondary prevention in chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) are blood pressure lowering and lipid-lowering therapy (LLT). The purpose of this study was to examine the control of systolic blood pressure (SBP) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in patients with CCS followed in primary care. Methods: This was a retrospective population-based cohort study of patients diagnosed with CCS at cardiology clinics in Uppsala Region, Sweden, between 2012 and 2020. Data from electronic health records were analyzed for SBP and LDL-C monitoring and secondary prevention target achievement during 3 years of follow-up, stratified by sex, age, and diabetes status. Sex differences in time to LLT initiation during the first year after CCS diagnosis were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards models. Results: In total, 1,452 patients (415 women and 1,037 men) were followed for a median of 3.2 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 1.4-5.8). Most patients had at least one SBP measurement during follow-up, and approximately half met SBP targets (50.9% of women and 56.1% of men at year 1). LDL-C monitoring was less common: at year 1, 40.8% of women and 28.7% of men lacked a measurement, and targets were achieved in 12.1% of women and 24.7% of men. By year 3, target achievement had declined further to 11.2 and 15.0%, respectively. Women were less likely than men to initiate LLT within the first year (adjusted hazard ratio 0.70, 95% confidence interval: 0.61-0.80, Conclusion: Large gaps in secondary prevention of patients with CCS were observed, with under-monitoring of LDL-C and declining use of LLT, particularly among women. Although SBP was routinely assessed, only half of patients achieved recommended levels. These findings highlight the need for systematic strategies in primary care to improve management in CCS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.