Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42729930›Full record

ArticleIBRO neuroscience reports2026

Interpretable machine learning for depression symptom classification in NHANES: Performance in a curated high-confidence corpus and the full survey population.

Omid Salimi, Zahra Ghahramani, Mahsa Taghavi Zenouz, Marziyeh Heidari, Alireza Amini, Fatemeh Nouroozi, Mobina Fathi, Arian Tavasol, Mohammad Reza Bateni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IBRO neuroscience reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Omid SalimiDepartment of Medicine, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran.
Zahra GhahramaniPharm.D. Student, Faculty of Pharmacy, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran.
Mahsa Taghavi ZenouzSchool of Medicine, Tabriz university of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Marziyeh HeidariFaculty of Medicine, Hormozgan, University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, Iran.
Alireza AminiDepartment of Medicine, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran.
Fatemeh NourooziEmergency Department of Sayad Shirazi Hospital, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran.
Mobina FathiShahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Arian TavasolSchool of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad Reza BateniComputer Science Department, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Depressive disorders are among the most common psychiatric conditions worldwide and frequently remain undetected or misinterpreted. Scalable computational tools may help characterize depressive-symptom patterns in large health datasets, but their clinical use requires realistic validation and calibration. Objective: We evaluated machine-learning models for classifying PHQ-9 depressive-symptom status in NHANES and compared performance in a curated high-confidence corpus and the full analytic population. Methods: This cross-sectional analysis included 37,959 NHANES participants with valid PHQ-9 data and prespecified demographic, sleep, and dietary predictors. The primary outcome was mild-or-greater depressive symptoms, defined as PHQ-9 ≥ 5. A balanced high-confidence corpus was constructed using clear PHQ-9 rules, teacher-model confidence ranking, Isolation Forest filtering, and class-specific resampling. A LightGBM classifier was compared with logistic regression, random forest, gradient boosting, support vector machine, XGBoost, k-nearest neighbors, and Gaussian naïve Bayes. Performance, calibration, temporal validation, sensitivity analyses, and SHAP-based interpretability were assessed. Results: The curated corpus contained 5000 balanced observations. LightGBM achieved near-perfect curated-holdout performance, but full-population performance was moderate: accuracy 0.678, F1-score 0.503, precision 0.407, recall 0.659, and ROC-AUC 0.726. Comparator models showed similar full-population discrimination. Removing sleep predictors reduced ROC-AUC to 0.611. Full-population calibration was poor, and self-reported trouble sleeping was the dominant contributor. Conclusion: Interpretable machine learning identified reproducible depressive-symptom patterns in NHANES, largely driven by sleep variables. However, modest precision and poor calibration preclude stand-alone clinical use without external validation and recalibration.

Indexed as

DepressionLightGBMMachine LearningMental HealthNHANESPHQ-9Predictive ModelingRandom Forest

Identifiers

PMID42729930
PMCPMC13563247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.