ArticleInterventional pain medicine2026
Durable pain relief following basivertebral nerve ablation in patients with prior lumbar decompression: A retrospective case series.
Article in Interventional pain medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Basivertebral nerve (BVN) ablation has emerged as a safe and effective treatment for vertebrogenic low back pain. However, patients with prior lumbar surgery were excluded from prior clinical trials, and BVN ablation outcomes in this patient population remain poorly characterized. Objective: To evaluate clinical outcomes following BVN ablation in patients with a history of lumbar decompression surgery. Methods: This retrospective case series included 14 adult patients who underwent BVN ablation at our institution from November 2019 to January 2025. Patients were included if they had a history of prior lumbar decompressive surgery with at least one overlapping vertebral level between the surgical site and subsequent BVN ablation levels. Pain severity was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at baseline, 4-6 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months post-procedure. Results: Mean (±SD) VAS decreased from 7.07 ± 2.24 at baseline to 4.43 ± 2.21 at 4-6 weeks, 3.71 ± 1.94 at 6 months, and 3.21 ± 1.89 at 12 months. The mean decrease in VAS from baseline was 3.86 ± 2.51 at 12 months. 12 patients (85.7%; 95% CI: 57.2%-98.2%) achieved a ≥ 2-point VAS decrease from baseline at 12 months, and 13 patients (92.9%; 95% CI: 66.1%-99.8%) reported functional improvement at 12 months. No vertebral compression fractures were observed during a mean (±SD) follow-up period of 3.29 ± 1.10 years. Conclusions: In this 14-patient retrospective case series, BVN ablation was associated with sustained and clinically meaningful pain reduction in patients with prior lumbar decompression surgery. Our findings suggest that evaluation for a vertebrogenic pain component should be considered in patients with persistent pain after lumbar decompression, as appropriately selected patients may still benefit from BVN ablation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.