Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42729886›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026

Divergent responses of forage quality indicators to environmental drivers in Eastern Mongolia.

Yun Jäschke, Oyunbileg Munkhzul, Uuganjargal Khaliun, Batlai Oyuntsetseg, Thanh-Noi Phan, Shuxin Ji, Lukas Lehnert, Khurelpurev Oyundelger, Christiane M Ritz, Karsten Wesche

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yun JäschkeSenckenberg Museum for Natural History Görlitz, Senckenberg - Leibniz Institution for Biodiversity and Earth System Research, Görlitz, Germany.
Oyunbileg MunkhzulInstitute of Geography and Geoecology, Mongolian Academy of Sciences, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia.
Uuganjargal KhaliunDepartment of Biology, School of Arts and Sciences, National University of Mongolia, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia.
Batlai OyuntsetsegDepartment of Biology, School of Arts and Sciences, National University of Mongolia, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia.
Thanh-Noi PhanDepartment of Geography, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitat Munchen, Munich, Germany.
Shuxin JiDepartment of Geography, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitat Munchen, Munich, Germany.
Lukas LehnertDepartment of Geography, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitat Munchen, Munich, Germany.
Khurelpurev OyundelgerSenckenberg Museum for Natural History Görlitz, Senckenberg - Leibniz Institution for Biodiversity and Earth System Research, Görlitz, Germany.
Christiane M RitzSenckenberg Museum for Natural History Görlitz, Senckenberg - Leibniz Institution for Biodiversity and Earth System Research, Görlitz, Germany.
Karsten WescheSenckenberg Museum for Natural History Görlitz, Senckenberg - Leibniz Institution for Biodiversity and Earth System Research, Görlitz, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Forage quality is crucial for determining livestock productivity as well as ecosystem health, and consequently is a critical parameter for sustainable rangeland management. However, most studies concentrate on forage amount alone, and it remains largely unknown to what extent climate, soil, and disturbance impact seasonal forage quality. Across spring, summer and autumn, we conducted a large-scale field study at 63 sites in the eastern Mongolian steppe, arguably the largest intact steppe region under traditional mobile land use. We performed exploratory multivariate analyses to check the correlation structure among forage indicators and environmental factors separately, and then used linear mixed models to assess the impact of season, and major environmental factors, i.e., precipitation, temperature, soil carbon-nitrogen (C-N) ratio, local disturbance, as well as the interaction between precipitation and disturbance on current standing biomass, and selected indicators of forage quality, i.e., community-weighted nitrogen content, crude protein (CP) yield, digestibility and water content of fresh biomass. Results showed a clear seasonal difference in all indicators except digestibility. Plant N contents at the community level declined significantly from 2.4% in spring to 2.1% in summer, then to 1.5% in autumn, while mean CP yield was 104 kg·ha

Indexed as

aboveground biomasscarrying capacitycrude protein yielddigestibilitydisturbancefunctional compositionplant nitrogen contentsteppe rangeland

Identifiers

PMID42729886
PMCPMC13564203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.