ArticleClinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology2026
Safety and Predictors of Clinically Significant Adverse Effects of Isotretinoin in Acne Vulgaris: A Retrospective Cohort Study from Saudi Arabia.
Article in Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Isotretinoin remains the most effective treatment for moderate-to-severe acne vulgaris; however, its use is frequently associated with mucocutaneous and metabolic adverse effects that may necessitate active clinical intervention. Data evaluating predictors of clinically significant toxicity in Saudi populations remain limited. Patients and Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary academic hospital in Saudi Arabia. Electronic medical records of patients with acne vulgaris treated with isotretinoin between January 2020 and December 2024 were reviewed. Demographic variables, acne severity, isotretinoin dosing characteristics, laboratory findings, adverse effects, management strategies, and treatment outcomes were extracted. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of adverse effects requiring clinical intervention. Results: A total of 444 patients were included. Most participants were aged 21-30 years (60.4%), and females represented 50.9% of the cohort. Clinical intervention was required in 70.7% of patients, including supportive care, treatment reduction and dose discontinuation to manage isotretinoin-related adverse effects. Mucocutaneous adverse effects, particularly cheilitis and xerosis, were the most frequently documented complications. Laboratory abnormalities were observed less frequently, although elevated LDL levels were identified in 9.9% of patients, followed by elevated total cholesterol (7.2%) and triglycerides (4.5%). Elevated liver enzymes were relatively uncommon (AST 4.1%, ALT 3.2%). Higher cumulative dose, dose escalation during therapy, and higher maximum dose significantly increased the likelihood of requiring clinical intervention. Female sex and higher body weight were associated with lower odds of intervention. Major improvement was achieved in 37.4%, complete clearance in 28.8%, giving a combined rate of 66.2% while recurrence after discontinuation occurred in 19.4%. Conclusion: Isotretinoin, proved efficacious clinically in the management of acne vulgaris, however was identified to be associated with high number of adverse effects which require active management. Multivariable regression identified that the increasing dose and cumulative dose were the most influential determinants of the drug therapy. Particularly, lipid abnormalities (elevated LDL) were clinically relevant for the included cohort of patients. The outcomes therefore emphasize the need for a personalised approach to dosing along with continuous monitoring to achieve the optimal results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.