Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42729835›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2026

Current status and future directions of multimodal deep learning normal tissue complication probability modelling in head and neck cancer radiotherapy.

Victoria Butterworth, Tom Young, Andrew P King, Teresa Guerrero Urbano

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Victoria ButterworthSchool of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Tom YoungSchool of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Andrew P KingSchool of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Teresa Guerrero UrbanoSchool of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) modelling is central to balancing tumour control and toxicity risk in radiotherapy (RT) for head and neck cancer (HNC). Despite major advances in radiation delivery and imaging, toxicity remains a major determinant of long-term quality of life in survivors. Classical NTCP models based on dose-volume histograms (DVHs) and phenomenological equations such as the Lyman-Kutcher-Burman model have provided clinically valuable guidance for decades but oversimplify the complex, multidimensional nature of the normal tissue radiation response. Recent developments in machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) have enabled the integration of large-scale clinical, imaging, dosimetric and biological data to generate more accurate, patient-specific toxicity predictions. However, data scarcity, endpoint variability, and limited external generalisability have restricted clinical translation. This mini-review summarises the current status of NTCP modelling in HNC, focusing on evolving multimodal DL approaches and data fusion strategies. A structured literature review approach identified 10 contemporary studies of multimodal DL models for radiotherapy-related toxicity prediction in HNC. Across included studies, fusion architectures were inconsistently reported and model development procedures were also variably described regarding feature selection, hyperparameter tuning, model selection and validation. Current multimodal DL NTCP models are promising but not yet ready for routine clinical use, with robust external validation, calibration assessment, reproducibility, clinical utility evaluation and prospective testing required before integration into RT decision-support workflows.

Indexed as

deep learningfusionhead and neckmultimodalNTCPradiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID42729835
PMCPMC13563208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.