ArticleACS omega2026
Interpretable QSPR Modeling of Bipolar Disorder Drugs Using Topological Indices and Machine Learning Regression.
Article in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The increasing demand for efficient and interpretable computational methods for molecular property prediction has stimulated the development of quantitative structure-property relationship (QSPR) models based on graph-theoretical molecular descriptors. Topological indices are numerical descriptors derived from graph-theoretical representations of chemical structures and are widely used in QSPR studies to predict physicochemical and biological properties. In this study, degree-based and neighborhood-degree-sum-based topological indices were computed for 18 drugs used to treat bipolar disorder and employed as descriptors for modeling physicochemical properties. linear regression, ridge regression, random forest, and XGBoost were systematically evaluated to investigate the suitability of classical and machine learning regression methods for QSPR modeling of a small molecular data set. The comparative analysis demonstrates that although ensemble machine-learning models (random forest and XGBoost) were capable of capturing nonlinear relationships, their predictive performance deteriorated under leave-one-out cross-validation because of the limited sample size. In contrast, ridge regression consistently produced the lowest prediction errors while preserving interpretability. Neighborhood-degree-sum-based descriptors produced lower prediction errors for seven of the nine investigated physicochemical properties, whereas degree-based descriptors remained stronger for boiling point and heavy atom count. Although meaningful relationships between molecular topology and physicochemical properties were identified, the findings are limited by the small data set and lack of external validation. Therefore, the proposed models should be considered as exploratory approximations. This study provides new insights into the structure-property relationships of bipolar disorder drugs and establishes a foundation for future studies using larger molecular data sets.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.