ArticleBioinformatics advances2026
PanelAppRex aggregates disease gene panels and facilitates sophisticated search.
Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Application of qualifying variants for genomic analysis.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Motivation: Gene panel data are essential for variant interpretation and genomic diagnostics, but existing resources are fragmented, inconsistently annotated, and not easily accessible for programmatic use. We developed PanelAppRex, a harmonised dataset and interactive search tool that integrates over 58 000 curated gene-disease panel associations. It supports natural language-style queries by gene, phenotype, disease group, and mode of inheritance, with results returned in machine-readable export formats. Results: The resulting dataset includes standardised gene identifiers, disease annotations, mode of inheritance, and literature support, enabling seamless integration into bioinformatic pipelines. We benchmarked 15 case studies spanning immunology, neurology, and additional disease areas. Under the recommended usage, in which the union of returned panels is considered, the causal gene was recovered in every case. Across all returned panels, the causal gene was present in 85.6% of panels. For manual interface interpretation, the causal gene was present in the user-selected best-fit panel(s) in all 15 benchmarked cases. Availability: The platform data is openly available at Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15736689, with source code at https://github.com/DylanLawless/PanelAppRex, and demonstration page at https://panelapprex.github.io/landing_page. The dataset is maintained for a minimum of two years following publication.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.