ArticleSustainable microbiology2026
Exploring and defining concepts of microbiome stewardship for the indoor built environment.
Article in Sustainable microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microbiome stewardship (MS) aims to maintain microbiome diversity and functioning to support human and ecosystem health. However, the built environment presents a unique challenge, as human-made indoor spaces lack a native microbial baseline. This review addresses this challenge and proposes a framework for MS for the built environment that bridges indoor exposure science with socio-ecological, engineering, and policy insights. We consider indoor spaces as active exposure ecologies shaped by ventilation, filtration, and moisture control. While mitigating harmful pollutants, dampness-related microbiota, and pathogens is an ethical and practical prerequisite for MS of the built environment, it is insufficient for achieving MS. We must shift from traditional concepts of sterility toward a model of "healthy porosity" through intentional microbial cultivation. Synthesis of current evidence highlights the health benefits associated with taxonomically rich, environmentally sourced microbial consortia, such as outdoor-, soil-, dog-, and plant-associated taxa. Moreover, moisture control, dust-reservoir maintenance, appropriate filtration, and supportive occupant behaviors are needed to favor benign and beneficial microbial communities. To transition building operations from pathogen suppression to intentional cultivation of health-supportive indoor microbiomes, we outline actionable stewardship goals that prioritize human health, favor benign environmental inputs, and promote occupant behaviors that sustain resilient microbial communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.