ReviewFrontiers in public health2026
New perspectives from evidence to action - patient-centered evidence transformation in evidence-based nursing: a narrative review.
Review in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Evidence transformation remains a major challenge in nursing practice, as existing approaches often focus on professional-driven implementation while insufficiently incorporating patient participation, accessibility of evidence, and contextual adaptation. A comprehensive patient-centered pathway for translating evidence into practice is needed. Aims: This narrative review aimed to critically examine existing evidence transformation models and develop a Patient-Centered Evidence Transformation Framework to support sustainable evidence-based nursing practice. Methods: A narrative review approach was adopted to synthesize literature on evidence transformation, implementation science, patient-centered care, and integrative nursing practice. Existing theoretical models, including the Knowledge-to-Action Model, Social Movement Model, Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services Framework, Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, and Shared Decision-Making Model, were critically analyzed. A conceptual framework was developed through theoretical integration and synthesis of patient-centered evidence transformation principles. Results: Existing models provide important insights into knowledge translation, implementation processes, and patient engagement but often address isolated components rather than a continuous transformation pathway. This review proposes a six-component Patient-Centered Evidence Transformation Framework, including Evidence Creation, Patient Version of Guidelines Development, Evidence-Based Science Popularization, Patient Decision Aids, Evidence Dissemination, and Application of Evidence. The framework highlights patients as active participants throughout the evidence lifecycle and provides guidance for evidence transformation in integrative Chinese and Western nursing practice. Conclusion: The proposed framework integrates evidence generation, patient empowerment, dissemination, and clinical application into a unified pathway.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.