Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42729786›Full record

ArticlePalliative care and social practice2026

Can the 'Deathbed Etiquette' guide support friends and family to navigate the dying process? A qualitative study examining the views of bereaved people.

Lara Datta Paulin, Louise Nelson, Katie Pears, Rhian Wyn Thomas, Sarah Clelland, Lesley Dunleavy, Margaret Doherty, Amy Gadoud

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Palliative care and social practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lara Datta PaulinInternational Observatory on End-of-Life Care, Lancaster Medical School, Health Innovation One, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
Louise NelsonInternational Observatory on End-of-Life Care, Lancaster Medical School, Health Innovation One, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-1829-0732
Katie PearsInternational Observatory on End-of-Life Care, Lancaster Medical School, Health Innovation One, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
Rhian Wyn ThomasInternational Observatory on End-of-Life Care, Lancaster Medical School, Health Innovation One, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
Sarah ClellandInternational Observatory on End-of-Life Care, Lancaster Medical School, Health Innovation One, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3497-0334
Lesley DunleavyInternational Observatory on End-of-Life Care, Lancaster Medical School, Health Innovation One, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5924-8145
Margaret DohertyThe Centre for the Art of Living and Dying Well, St Mary's University, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-6587-3163
Amy GadoudInternational Observatory on End-of-Life Care, Lancaster Medical School, Health Innovation One, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: How people experience the death of a friend or relative is impacted by their knowledge of what to expect when someone is dying and how prepared they feel. Deathbed Etiquette is a written resource providing information about the dying process to support friends and relatives through this experience. Objective: To explore the views of bereaved people on the guide Deathbed Etiquette. Design: Qualitative study, utilising semi structured interviews. Methods: Participants were recruited through a hospice and hospital in the Northwest of England and social media between December 2023 and March 2025. Framework analysis was used to analyse the data. Results: Bereaved participants (n=22) expressed a sense of reassurance from the guide and felt that this additional written information would have been valuable. Content identified as particularly important included what the dying process physically looks like, uncertainty, what to expect after death and the needs of friends, relatives and children. The importance of an individualised approach was recognised; a generic guide may not adequately meet everybody's needs and cultural and religious variations are not addressed in the guide. There was mixed feedback on the format of the guide, with suggestions for change. The guide should be delivered alongside a sensitive conversation with a healthcare professional and would be most beneficial when dying occurs at home. It could also be freely available in public spaces, to improve death literacy. Conclusion: Deathbed Etiquette is a useful tool to improve the experience of those supporting a friend or relative at the end of life. However, changes should be made to improve its usefulness and accessibility. An individual approach to information provision is needed and one guide cannot meet the needs of everyone. The findings can be applied more widely to other resources, however limitations in religious and cultural generalisability should be considered.

Indexed as

bereavementcarer supportdeathdeathbed etiquettedyingend of life carehealth communicationpalliative careunderstanding the dying processwritten resources at end of life

Identifiers

PMID42729786
PMCPMC13562848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.