ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2026
Social approach-avoidance conflict: Behavioural, emotional, and neural correlates along a depression-social anxiety spectrum.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Approach-avoidance conflict, in which the same option entails both rewarding and aversive consequences, has been proposed as a key process in internalizing disorders such as depression and social anxiety. Yet, human paradigms that model approach-avoidance conflict and link it to brain function remain scarce. In particular, it has been emphasized the need for studying this conflict in social contexts. We developed a Social Approach-Avoidance Conflict (SAAC) task that involved a social evaluative demand manipulation, and combined it with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in 135 young adults. On each trial, participants decided whether to accept a variable reward at the cost of increasing the presence of more or less demanding judges in a future public speaking evaluation, or to avoid and receive a minimal default reward. Depression and social anxiety (D-SA) symptoms were summarized into a single continuous dimension derived from principal component analysis of psychological questionnaires. Behaviourally, higher payments increased approach, whereas higher judge ranks increased negative affect and avoidance. Higher D-SA scores were associated with reduced positive and heightened negative emotional responses to higher-rank judges, stronger preferences for low-rank judges, and greater avoidance of high-rank judges. Neurally, increasing judge rank recruited the dmPFC/dACC during approach decisions, and higher D-SA symptoms were associated with stronger responses in these regions. Increasing payment during approach engaged dmPFC/vmPFC, PCC, and posterior insula, and these reward-related responses were attenuated at higher D-SA levels. In conclusion, internalizing symptoms of depression and social anxiety are associated with a bias in emotional and behavioural responses when a reward competes with a social evaluative threat. At the neural level, internalizing symptoms were associated with an enhanced aversive/conflict signalling in the dmPFC/dACC, and with reduced reward-related activity. Findings shed light on the mechanisms underlying costly social avoidance in internalizing disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.