ArticleVeterinary and animal science2026
Artificial rearing with milk replacers of varying fat and total solids compared with natural suckling: Pre- and post-weaning performance of lambs.
Article in Veterinary and animal science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluated the effects of increasing total solids (TS) and fat concentration in milk replacer (MR) on the performance of artificially reared lambs compared with naturally suckled lambs. Forty-eight 3-day-old Shal lambs were assigned to natural suckling (EWE; 6.37% fat, 17.4% TS) or one of three MR treatments: low-fat-low-solids (LF-LS; 3.56% fat, 16.3% TS), low-fat-high-solids (LF-HS; 4.27% fat, 19.6% TS), or high-fat-high-solids (HF-HS; 4.95% fat, 19.6% TS). Increasing TS raised the milk protein concentration to a level comparable to that of ewe milk (4.8%), while partial replacement of lactose with fat reduced osmolality in HF-HS relative to LF-HS (466 vs. 506 mOsm/kg). Lambs were fed milk until day 62 and monitored until day 103. Lambs fed LF-HS and HF-HS consumed more protein and metabolizable energy than those fed LF-LS, resulting in improved pre- and postweaning average daily gain and skeletal growth. Furthermore, LF-LS lambs exhibited lower serum cholesterol, a tendency toward lower glucose, and higher β-hydroxybutyrate concentrations at weaning, indicating a less favorable energy status. Although HF-HS increased nutrient intake and hip width compared with LF-HS, both high-solids formulations achieved growth comparable to that of EWE. Nutrient digestibility, diarrhea days, and serum concentrations of insulin, cortisol, and thyroxine were unaffected, whereas serum total protein was greater in EWE than in the MR groups. Despite the associated increase in osmolality, increasing MR solids from 16.3% to 19.6%, particularly in HF-HS, improved nutrient intake and supported growth comparable to natural suckling without adversely affecting the assessed health indicators.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.