ReviewPharmaceutical science advances2026
In vivo immune cell engineering from bench to clinical reality.
Review in Pharmaceutical science advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adoptive immune cell therapies, exemplified by chimeric antigen receptor T cells, have transformed the treatment of hematological malignancies. However, their broader clinical application is limited by complex ex vivo manufacturing, high cost, and safety concerns. In vivo immune cell engineering has emerged as an alternative strategy that delivers genetic instructions directly to immune cells, thereby generating or modulating therapeutic immune cells within the body and reducing the reliance on individualized in vitro operations. These advances underscore the need for a systematic evaluation of this emerging field. Therefore, this review systematically summarizes the mechanistic principles and delivery strategies underlying in vivo immune cell engineering, with an emphasis on in vivo CAR-T cell generation and the engineering of other immune cells. We then discuss major viral and non-viral delivery platforms and clarify how these platforms influence cargo delivery, cell specificity, and functional immune-cell programming. We further discuss recent preclinical and emerging clinical advances across cancer, autoimmune diseases, and degenerative diseases, while examining key translational challenges, including delivery specificity, off-target effects, controllability, persistence, and manufacturing standardization. Overall, although the field of in vivo immune cell engineering is advancing rapidly, its clinical success will depend on coordinated improvements in delivery precision, therapeutic efficacy, safety, and controllable immune-cell programming.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.