ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
An ensemble model approach for identifying pulmonary tuberculosis on chest X-ray.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tuberculosis (TB) is a global infectious disease, and chest x-ray (CXR) examination is a primary screening method. However, manual image interpretation can suffer from low diagnostic efficiency, poor consistency, and limitations imposed by the experience of the interpreters, necessitating the development of intelligent identification tools. This study aims to construct and validate a deep learning ensemble model-based CXR image recognition system for TB, achieving accurate and intelligent screening. The Shenzhen TB CXR public dataset was used as the training dataset, randomly divided into training and test datasets; the Montgomery public dataset was used as an independent external validation dataset. Nine convolutional neural network models (DenseNet201, EfficientNetB7, EfficientNetV2S, InceptionResNetV2, MobileNetV3Large, NASNetLarge, ResNet50V2, VGG19, and Xception) were built using the PyTorch framework and benchmarked. The optimal model was selected using the F1 score as the core metric. Furthermore, using the raw scores of the individual models as input features, four ensemble strategies-linear regression, logistic regression, performance-weighted averaging, and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost)-were constructed to evaluate the classification performance and generalization ability of each model. The results show that all nine individual models can distinguish between normal and TB CXR images (all
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.