ArticleAnnals of the Entomological Society of America2026
Beyond conventional pollinators: advancing diversity assessments of neglected insect taxa.
Article in Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ideally, biodiversity surveys would sample insect assemblages randomly and without taxonomic bias, yet most protocols still prioritize conspicuous, charismatic, or economically important taxa (eg pollinators). Consequently, Diptera, one of the most species-rich and ecologically important insect orders, remain largely overlooked, with only a few families like Syrphidae routinely included in biodiversity assessments. To address this imbalance, here we tested a protocol designed to better capture the diversity of non-charismatic dipteran groups by comparing hand-netting and pan traps and by overcoming taxonomic impediments with cost-efficient DNA "megabarcoding" using non-destructive DNA extraction and third-generation sequencing. We applied it to brachyceran fly (Diptera: Brachycera) assemblages across four Mediterranean coastal habitats, key for coastal protection and tourism yet poorly documented. We clustered 13,877 cytochrome c oxidase subunit I barcodes into 823 molecular operational taxonomic units (MOTUs) at a 2% distance threshold, more than 10% of all Diptera species recorded for Italy. MOTUs were assigned to 48 families by morphological inspection of a single representative specimen. We then assigned ecological guilds at the family level, enabling joint assessment of taxonomic and functional diversity. Pan traps collected twice as many specimens and reached higher sample coverage than transect counts, while total MOTU richness was similar. However, assemblages differed in composition, indicating that the two methods are complementary, and still shared 27% to 40% of ecological-guild representation across habitats. Our integrative discovery framework reveals outstanding Diptera diversity and provides a scalable framework combining multiple sampling techniques with high-throughput molecular workflows, applicable to other neglected insect taxa and ecosystems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.