ReviewCyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.)2026
Intracortical Microstimulation in Brain-Computer Interfaces: Evoking Perception and Plasticity.
Review in Cyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intracortical microstimulation (ICMS), the activation of specific neuronal populations via microelectrodes implanted in the cortex, has emerged as a key technology for invasive brain-computer interfaces (BCIs). This article reviews the technical foundations and functional applications of ICMS within the BCI field, highlighting its diverse capabilities in both perception construction and targeted neuromodulation, while emphasizing the interface and parameter constraints that shape its long-term use. At the technical level, we analyze the evolution of ICMS microelectrode interfaces from rigid arrays to flexible, biomimetic, and biohybrid strategies, alongside key pulse-train parameters relevant to neural recruitment and application safety. Functionally, we discuss how biomimetic and spatiotemporally patterned ICMS generates high-resolution artificial tactile and visual perception, and how ICMS can serve as learnable information channels to guide behavior. We further consider temporally contingent and closed-loop ICMS as plasticity-based approaches for modulating cortical functional connectivity and pathological network activity in selected experimental models, while noting translational challenges related to stability, scalability, safety, and patient variability. Finally, we extend the discussion to novel biohybrid neural interfaces, including cell-seeded interface modifications, axon-guidance strategies, and stem-cell- and brain-organoid-integrated platforms, which provide a theoretical reference for next-generation biointegrated neuromodulation technologies in BCIs. Together, this review evaluates ICMS in BCIs along 2 central lines: evoking artificial perception and engaging plasticity-based modulation, while highlighting that long-term translation will require coordinated advances in interface reliability, stimulation encoding, closed-loop calibration, safety evaluation, and biohybrid integration.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.