ArticleiScience2026
Resting-state neural oscillations predict individual differences in verbal learning and encoding strategy use.
Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Individuals adopt different encoding strategies to facilitate learning, yet few studies have examined the neurophysiological basis of these strategies across individuals. The present work addresses this gap by extending our previous findings on the direct relationship between cortical spectral power, measured via resting-state magnetoencephalography, and standard cognitive performance, to test whether resting-state neural features predict individual differences in encoding strategy preferences. Our results highlight the complex interactions between endogenous brain oscillations, learning, and verbal encoding strategies assessed by the California Verbal Learning Test-Second Edition (CVLT-2). First, resting-state theta oscillations were significantly associated with verbal learning and subjective clustering strategies. Second, semantic clustering was facilitated by oscillatory patterns in the left sensory-motor regions. Finally, serial and semantic clustering strategies showed opposite regression patterns, indicating a competitive interaction. Together, these findings provide insights into resting-state neural markers associated with diverse encoding strategies in verbal learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.