ReviewFrontiers in psychiatry2026
Conspiratorial misogyny and the radicalization continuum: male supremacy as a dominant ideology in contemporary extremism.
Review in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Male supremacist ideology is quickly becoming one of the most prevalent forms of contemporary extremism in the world. In many ways, it is similar to how other extremist movements work, and the radicalization of its supporters follows familiar pathways. In other ways, the rise of male supremacy is both an outcome of increasing radicalization and an underlying risk for gender-based violence (GBV). This work aims to highlight key understandings of male supremacy as it relates to the manosphere and GBV. It also highlights how radicalization and ideology interact, how that radicalization leads to GBV, how male supremacy fills this ideological aspect of radicalization, and how conspiratorial thinking underpins much of male supremacist ideology. From there, we offer some practical risk and protective factors for practitioners, framed in a public health-informed understanding of radicalization prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.