ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2026
Biomechanical Comparison of Patellar Fixation Techniques in Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction: A Pediatric Cadaveric Study.
Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The biomechanical properties of different medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction (MPFLR) techniques have been described in adult cadaveric models. However, little is known about the biomechanical properties of these techniques in pediatric specimens. Purpose: To (1) evaluate the biomechanical fixation strength of pediatric patellae in the context of MPFLR and (2) compare the performance of suture-anchor (SA) and bone-tunnel (BT) patellar fixation. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Ten pediatric cadaveric patellae from 6 donors (3 male and 3 female, mean 9.8 + 0.75 years, range 9-11 years) were utilized. For the all-SA group, two 1.8-mm all-SA, each loaded with sutures, were placed on the medial side of the patella at the articular cartilage margin. For the BTs, two 2-mm tunnels were drilled from the medial side of the patella to the anterior patellar surface. No. 2 braided suture was then passed through the tunnels. Both constructs were loaded into a servomechanical testing apparatus, and a suture was tied to the top frame such that pullout would be in the same plane as the fixation construct, oriented to approximate the plane of the native MPFL insertion. Results: BT constructs demonstrated a mean ultimate failure load of 169.8 ± 88.6 N, significantly higher than the 55.3 ± 20.1 N observed for SA constructs ( Conclusion: In this pediatric cadaveric model, BT fixation demonstrated higher ultimate failure loads than the SA fixation, while construct stiffness was similar between techniques. Clinical Relevance: To our knowledge, this is the first biomechanical study of MPFL patellar fixation reconstruction techniques performed in pediatric specimens. To reduce the risk of patellar graft fixation failure, the relatively low load-to-failure of all-SA fixation demonstrated in this study may be considered when treating pediatric patients with lower bone density. Moreover, biomechanically superior small-diameter oblique BTs with low fracture risk may be considered to maximize time-zero fixation strength compared with SAs in the pediatric population. However, these results are limited by evaluating only a single all-SA design and a testing methodology that focused on time-zero fixation strength, without cyclic loading or in vivo healing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.