ArticlePalliative care and social practice2026
Collaborative networks in palliative care: Analysis of principles and models in Argentina and Colombia.
Article in Palliative care and social practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Interdisciplinary networking among palliative care teams can extend beyond the healthcare setting, fostering network research and other activities that facilitate collaboration with diverse individuals and institutions. In Argentina and Colombia, notable models exemplify the potential of palliative care networking. Objective: To identify and compare the networking practices of palliative care teams in four Argentine institutions with the principles of the Colombian palliative care network model. Design: Descriptive qualitative study grounded in a conceptual framework of network thinking. Methods: Participatory observation, discussion groups, and individual interviews were conducted with palliative care teams from Argentine institutions affiliated with the Pallium Latin America Institute. The principles underlying the palliative care network model designed in Colombia were analyzed in relation to those observed in Argentina. Results: Four institutions participated, including two public hospitals in Buenos Aires and two private hospitals in Mar del Plata and Córdoba. Evidence of networking was found in day-to-day activities and collaborative research conducted nationally and internationally through RED-InPal. Autonomy, collaboration, adaptability, and innovation (pillars of network thinking) were reflected in the principles guiding the Colombian model. Each team engages in networking activities, and team participation in research was seen as a significant effort toward achieving long-term sustainability. Conclusion: Multiple networks exist that can be established in palliative care services, forming a broad and interconnected network. Governance, dynamism, interaction, participation, sustainability, and identity are key pillars that support the ongoing strengthening of collaborative palliative care networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.