ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2026
Coaching beyond the game: a qualitative study of volunteer coaches in European grassroots esports.
Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Grassroots esports is increasingly organised through sports clubs and community-based initiatives for children and young people, yet little is known about how volunteer coaches understand and describe their roles in these settings. Existing esports coaching research has primarily focused on performance-oriented contexts, leaving limited insight into how coaches make sense of grassroots settings where participation, inclusion, social development, and safe digital cultures may be as important as technical skill development. This qualitative study explored how volunteer grassroots esports coaches in Norway, Denmark, and the Netherlands understood and described their coaching roles. Methods: Seventeen coaches participated in semi-structured online interviews conducted between March and May 2026. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Results: The analysis generated three themes. First, coaches primarily understood their role as youth-oriented social facilitators rather than game-specific technical instructors, emphasising adult presence, safe participation, positive behaviour, and inclusive environments. Second, coaches described how limited equipment, volunteer availability, access to formal coach education, and practical coaching resources constrained their ability to provide structured and meaningful activities. Third, health and lifestyle guidance occupied a marginal and weakly systematised position in everyday coaching practice. While energy drinks were commonly managed through clear rules, broader topics such as sleep, nutrition, physical activity, and recovery were often perceived as outside the scope of the coaching role or difficult to address with players. Discussion: Overall, the findings suggest that grassroots esports coaching is best understood as a hybrid practice situated between sport coaching, youth work, digital culture, and community volunteering. Strengthening grassroots esports coaching may benefit from accessible coach education, practical session resources, peer-learning arenas, and clear guidance on inclusion, online communication, player behaviour, and health-related boundaries, rather than simply transferring elite esports coaching models to grassroots settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.