ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2026
Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07454902 (From Kitchen to Clinic), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
From Kitchen to Clinic: A Family-Centered, Food-As-Medicine Approach Using Medically Tailored Meals and Caregiver Coaching in Pediatric Oncology Care
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Children undergoing cancer treatment are at high risk for malnutrition, poor diet quality, and early cardiometabolic risk due to treatment-related side effects, disrupted appetite, and household-level barriers to healthy eating. Caregivers play a central role in nutritional support during treatment but often experience substantial burden, time constraints, and nutrition insecurity. Food-as-medicine strategies, including medically tailored meals (MTMs), have shown promise in adult populations but remain underexplored in pediatric oncology, particularly during active treatment and within family-centered models. Objective: The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and adherence of Methods: This prospective, single-arm feasibility study will enroll 60 caregiver-child dyads (N = 120) recruited from three outpatient pediatric oncology clinics at a large children's hospital. The 12-week intervention includes an intensive phase (weeks 1-8) with weekly MTM delivery and caregiver coaching, followed by a tapered phase (weeks 9-12) with reduced meal frequency and bi-weekly coaching. Feasibility outcomes include recruitment, retention, assessment completion, intervention adherence, and acceptability, evaluated against predefined progression criteria. Exploratory outcomes will be assessed at baseline and at 3, 6, and 12 months post-intervention using validated dietary, anthropometric, clinical, and caregiver-reported measures. Trial registration: NCT07454902.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.