ArticleiScience2026
TargetQC: A targeted quality control framework for clinical genomic testing.
Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reliable genetic testing depends on accurate assessment of sequencing quality in clinically relevant genomic regions that directly influence variant interpretation. We developed TargetQC, a flexible quality control framework that supports user-defined gene sets, coverage thresholds, and variant sets for evaluating sequencing performance across exome sequencing (ES) and genome sequencing (GS) platforms. TargetQC assesses exon and gene coverage, identifies regions meeting predefined coverage thresholds, evaluates variant detection accuracy, and measures sequencing quality at pathogenic variant sites. We applied TargetQC to the reference sample NA12878 and 665 clinical samples across five ES platforms and one GS platform. ES-VendorB and ES-VendorE achieved the most complete coverage of OMIM coding regions in NA12878, whereas ES-VendorD and ES-VendorE showed the highest coverage compliance in clinical samples. ES-VendorB and GS demonstrated the highest variant detection accuracy. TargetQC provides a practical framework for benchmarking sequencing performance and informing platform selection in clinical genomics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.