ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2026
A confidence-gated source selection strategy for cross-session transfer in brain-computer interfaces.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cross-session variability remains a major obstacle to the reliable operation of motor imagery (MI)-based brain-computer interfaces (BCI), particularly when systems are reused across multiple days. When multiple prior sessions from the same subject are available, two key questions arise before domain transfer: which source sessions to select and how to effectively utilize them. We address these questions by developing confidence-gated, selective-transfer pipelines: a Minimum-Distance Multi-Source Pipeline (MMP) that only uses source sessions close to the target, and a Bridge Domain Pipeline (BDP) that exploits both near and far sources to improve robustness. We evaluated these novel pipelines against uniform-pooling (MAP) and distance-weighted-pooling (DWP) baseline methods on two public motor imagery EEG datasets under matched experimental configurations of feature extraction, classification, and domain adaptation algorithms. The benchmark results support an endpoint-specific interpretation rather than a single accuracy ranking. Specifically, MAP achieved the highest maximum-configuration accuracy, DWP demonstrated the highest average accuracy across configurations, and on the primary dataset MAP, DWP, and BDP exhibited no statistically significant differences as the top-performing pipelines for data-driven configuration selection. In contrast, MMP
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.