Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42729409›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Layer-sensitive cognitive offloading in generative AI-assisted writing: supported performance and independent no-AI outcomes.

Xinran Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Xinran ChenSchool of Foreign Languages, Jinggangshan University, Ji'an, Jiangxi, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Writing with generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) can improve a supported product without necessarily strengthening the competence that remains after support is removed. This study examined that distinction through a layer-sensitive account of cognitive offloading. Methods: In this eight-week quasi-experimental classroom study, 180 Chinese undergraduates from six intact English academic-writing classes entered the study and 168 completed the protocol. Two classes were assigned to each of three conditions: no-AI writing, bounded AI support with compulsory reflection, and open AI collaboration. Students completed a baseline task, three intervention assignments, and a supervised Week 8 independent no-AI near-transfer task. Results: Open AI collaboration had the highest observed supported-writing mean ( Discussion: Because conditions were allocated by only six intact classes and the bounded condition combined delegation restrictions with compulsory reflection, the results are interpreted as classroom-level, mechanism-consistent associations rather than definitive causal effects. The findings distinguish performance achieved with GenAI from competence demonstrated independently after support is removed.

Indexed as

academic writingcognitive offloadinggenerative artificial intelligencehigher-order thinkingindependent performancelearner agencyself-regulated writing

Identifiers

PMID42729409
PMCPMC13562006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.