Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42729395›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Work alienation among young university teachers in China.

Jing Li, Danlei Lin, Tingting Chang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jing LiSchool of Education, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, China.
Danlei LinSchool of Education, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, China.
Tingting ChangSchool of Education, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Young university teachers in China often begin their careers under competitive employment arrangements that combine intensive teaching and research demands with uncertain prospects for long-term advancement. Methods: Using cross-sectional survey data from 532 young university teachers in Chinese undergraduate institutions, this study examined how adverse job characteristics, background characteristics, and perceived organizational environment were associated with work alienation. Confirmatory factor analysis, measurement validation, integrated regression models, and moderation analyses were conducted. Results: After institutional clustering was considered, lack of support and fairness, perceived busyness, and self-bias/perceived prejudice remained positively associated with work alienation, whereas the association for interpersonal strain and conflict was not robust. Perceived organizational environment was negatively associated with work alienation, but the proposed moderation was not supported. Discussion: The findings identify associations between perceived work conditions, perceived organizational environment, and work alienation. Given the cross-sectional design, causal and temporal interpretations require longitudinal or experimental evidence.

Indexed as

Chinese higher educationearly-career academicsjob characteristicsperceived organizational environmentwork alienationyoung university teachers

Identifiers

PMID42729395
PMCPMC13562015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.