ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
When spectators feel ashamed: vicarious shame and behavioral responses to in-group misconduct.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In the context of sport spectatorship, spectators may experience feelings of vicarious shame when witnessing their in-group members' misconduct, which can significantly impact their behavioral responses. Despite growing interest in this phenomenon, it remains unclear which factors impact the emergence of vicarious shame among spectators and how this emotion shapes subsequent behavioral intentions. The current study adopted a cross-sectional design to examine how sports spectators' negative evaluations of deviant in-group members were associated with their experience of vicarious shame, and in turn, their subsequent behavioral intentions (i.e., distance, repair, and punishment), as well as the moderating role of group identification in this process. Methods: Participants were 376 Chinese adult spectators who reported having experienced vicarious shame during sports competitions. The spectators self-reported on their negative evaluations, behavioral intentions, vicarious shame, and group identification. A moderated mediation model was conducted using structural equation modeling to test the hypothesized associations. Results: Results showed that vicarious shame mediated the positive associations between negative evaluation and all three behavioral intentions. Furthermore, group identification strengthened the positive association between negative evaluation and vicarious shame. Conclusion: These findings highlight vicarious shame as a multifaceted emotion that can serve important social and moral regulatory functions in group processes, providing valuable implications for moral education initiatives among sports spectators.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.