ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
More is not always better: longitudinal associations and nonlinear dose-response relationships between physical activity, psychological capital, and positive body image among Chinese university students.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study examined the longitudinal associations between physical activity (PA), psychological capital (PsyCap), and positive body image, operationalized as body appreciation, among Chinese university students. We further evaluated the mediating role of PsyCap and explored potential nonlinear dose-response relationships between different dimensions of PA and body appreciation. Methods: A two-wave longitudinal survey with a three-month interval was conducted among 669 university students from four universities in Z City, China. PA was assessed using the Physical Activity Rating Scale-3 (PARS-3), PsyCap was measured using the Psychological Capital Questionnaire-24 (PCQ-24), and body appreciation was assessed using the Body Appreciation Scale-2 (BAS-2). Cross-lagged panel models were used to examine prospective associations, longitudinal mediation was evaluated using bias-corrected bootstrap procedures, and polynomial regression models were fitted to investigate nonlinear dose-response relationships. Results: Male students reported significantly higher levels of PA, PsyCap, and body appreciation than female students (all Conclusion: Higher levels of PA were prospectively associated with greater PsyCap and body appreciation among Chinese university students. PsyCap partially accounted for the statistical covariation in the prospective association between PA and body appreciation. Different dimensions of PA demonstrated distinct dose-response patterns, suggesting that the psychological benefits of PA may vary according to exercise intensity, duration, and frequency. These findings indicate prospective temporal associations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.