Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42729364›Full record

SynthesisOncology reviews2026

Clinical value of combined

Ting Wang, Jianguo Zhang, Jiayang Wang, Xiaoqun Dong, Qiushi Lin, Leiming Guo, Bo Zhang, Yue Cao, Yining Zhai, Mathhew Hadfield and 6 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Oncology reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Ting Wang *Department of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University and Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Jianguo Zhang *Department of Pathology, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, China.
Jiayang Wang *Department of Pathology, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, China.
Xiaoqun Dong *Precision Health Program, Department of Radiology, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States.
Qiushi LinPrecision Health Program, Department of Radiology, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States.
Leiming GuoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University and Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Bo ZhangDepartment of Pathology, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, China.
Yue CaoDepartment of Pathology, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, China.
Yining ZhaiDepartment of Pathology, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, China.
Mathhew HadfieldDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Rhode Island Hospital, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, United States.
Khan HinaDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Rhode Island Hospital, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, United States.
Abbas E AbbasDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Rhode Island Hospital, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, United States.
Hong GeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University and Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Liang ChengDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, The Legorreta Cancer Center at Brown University, and Brown University Health, Providence, RI, United States.
Hang XingDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Rhode Island Hospital, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, United States.
Yifei LiuDepartment of Pathology, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, with poor prognosis in advanced stage diseases. Although early diagnosis has the potential to improve patient outcomes, current diagnostic methods remain suboptimal, highlighting the need for accurate molecular biomarkers. We systematically reviewed 49 studies to evaluate the diagnostic performance of SHOX2 methylation, RASSF1A methylation, and their combined panel for lung cancer detection. The combined SHOX2/RASSF1A methylation panel demonstrated a pooled sensitivity of 77.8% (95% CI: 72.3%-82.5%) and specificity of 89.0% (95% CI: 86.6%-91.1%), with an HSROC area under the curve (AUC) of 0.916. SHOX2 methylation alone yielded a sensitivity of 69.4% and specificity of 91.7%, whereas RASSF1A methylation showed lower sensitivity (45.7%) but the highest specificity (93.8%). Pairwise comparisons demonstrated that the combined panel significantly improved sensitivity compared with either SHOX2 or RASSF1A alone while maintaining specificity comparable to SHOX2, although lower than that of RASSF1A. Subgroup analyses showed that assay method and pathological subtype contributed to differences in pooled sensitivity, whereas leave-one-out sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the pooled estimates. In conclusion, the combined SHOX2/RASSF1A methylation panel provides a more balanced diagnostic performance than either biomarker alone and represents a promising adjunctive approach for lung cancer detection. Future studies should focus on standardizing detection methods, integrating these biomarkers with other diagnostic modalities, and evaluating their diagnostic performance in early-stage lung cancer to further enhance their clinical utility.

Indexed as

biomarkerDNA methylationearly detectionliquid biopsylung cancermolecular diagnosisRASSF1ASHOX2

Identifiers

PMID42729364
PMCPMC13562240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.