Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42729351›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Vividness of visual imagery is associated with perceived clarity of recall but not with accuracy during exams.

Zitian Xing, Andrea Nicholas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zitian XingDepartment of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States.
Andrea NicholasDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Visual imagery may aid learning by facilitating vivid mental images, but it remains unclear whether greater imagery vividness improves students' exam performance through enhanced visual recall clarity. This study examines the association between vividness of visual imagery and recall clarity during exams and evaluates their direct and indirect links to exam performance. Methods: Undergraduate students ( Results: Visual imagery ability and subjective recall clarity were positively correlated, but neither predicted answer correctness nor overall exam scores. A statistically significant association between VVIQ scores and overall GPA was observed, but its practical significance was negligible. Additionally, visual learning preference was statistically associated with recall clarity, although the small effect size and limited practical significance did not predict exam performance. Among reported study approaches, recall of lecture-based learning was associated with higher answer correctness than recall of online resources. Discussion: Taken together, visual imagery vividness, perceived recall clarity, and visual learning preference did not predict summative exam performance, whereas recall of lecture-based learning during the exam was associated with better performance. This suggests that visual imagery ability is not a major predictor of exam success and that keeping pace with in-class instruction and prioritizing classroom learning are more closely related to better outcomes.

Indexed as

exam performancelearning preferencesneuroscience educationrecall claritystudy approachesVVIQ

Identifiers

PMID42729351
PMCPMC13561970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.