Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42729349›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

A Case of a Repeatedly Missed Aneurysm in a Patient With Third Nerve Palsy.

Du Cheng, Tulsi Mehta, Sharanya Deshmukh, Evan Silverstein

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Du ChengOphthalmology, Virginia Commonwealth University Health Systems, Richmond, USA.
Tulsi MehtaOphthalmology, Virginia Commonwealth University Health Systems, Richmond, USA.
Sharanya DeshmukhOphthalmology, Virginia Commonwealth University Health Systems, Richmond, USA.
Evan SilversteinOphthalmology, Virginia Commonwealth University Health Systems, Richmond, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medically complex presentations may pose a diagnostic challenge for providers, highlighting the need for inter-team communication and independent imaging review. We report a single case in which the patient presented with cranial nerve III palsy from a posterior communicating artery (PCOM) aneurysm that was missed on three separate angiographies. The patient initially presented with an incomplete cranial nerve (CN) III palsy and had workup and treatment for giant cell arteritis (GCA). Three months later, she presented again with worsened, complete CN III palsy. Upon independent review of CT and MRI angiography by the ophthalmology and neuro-radiology team, an 8 mm aneurysm of the right internal carotid artery (ICA) adjacent to the posterior communicating artery (PCOM) (initially missed) was identified. The patient was treated with percutaneous coil embolization, which resulted in partial recovery of her CN III function. This case demonstrates the importance of maintaining a high index of suspicion, independently reviewing radiologic imaging, and inter-team discussion.

Indexed as

computed tomographic angiographyeyelid ptosisoculomotor nerve (cn iii) palsyposterior communicating artery (pcom)true posterior communicating artery aneurysm

Identifiers

PMID42729349
PMCPMC13561960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.