Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42729326›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

AI literacy and innovative work behavior among Chinese university teachers: indirect associations through AI-TPACK and moderation by organizational inertia.

Si Xu, Ge Zhang, Wei Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Si XuCollege of Education, Binzhou Polytechnic University, Binzhou, China.
Ge ZhangCollege of Education, Binzhou Polytechnic University, Binzhou, China.
Wei XuCollege of Intelligent Science and Engineering, Beijing University of Agriculture, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Artificial intelligence is increasingly integrated into higher education, raising questions about how teachers' AI-related competencies are associated with innovative work behavior. Methods: Based on survey data from 510 university teachers in China, this study examined the relationships among artificial intelligence literacy (AIL), artificial intelligence technological pedagogical content knowledge (AI-TPACK), innovative work behavior (IWB), and organizational inertia (OI). Results: AIL was positively associated with both AI-TPACK and IWB, and a significant indirect association between AIL and IWB through AI-TPACK was identified. OI moderated the associations between AIL and AI-TPACK and between AIL and IWB, with both associations becoming weaker at higher levels of OI. However, the interaction between AI-TPACK and OI in predicting IWB was not statistically significant. Discussion: These findings highlight the relevance of both teachers' AI-related competencies and organizational context to innovative work behavior in higher education.

Indexed as

AI literacyAI-TPACKhigher educationinnovative work behaviororganizational inertia

Identifiers

PMID42729326
PMCPMC13562041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.