Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42729306›Full record

ArticleJournal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty2026

Increasing reverse total shoulder liner constraint in clinically planned cases causes decreased simulated range of motion and LIMIT, a novel phenomenon.

Joseph W DiCecco, Adam Maestas, Axel Clement, Hugo Giambini, Matthew T Glazier, Anil K Dutta, Robert U Hartzler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Joseph W DiCeccoUT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX.
Adam MaestasUT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX.
Axel ClementUniversité Paris-Saclay, Paris, France.
Hugo GiambiniUniversity of Texas San Antonio, San Antonio, TX.
Matthew T GlazierBurkhart Research Institute for Orthopaedics, San Antonio, TX.
Anil K DuttaUT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX.
Robert U HartzlerBurkhart Research Institute for Orthopaedics, San Antonio, TX.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Optimization of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) component design and positioning can improve outcomes. Polyethylene liner constraint (depth/radius) influences prosthetic stability and simulated shoulder range of motion (sROM). Increased constraint may reduce sROM due to earlier polyethylene-to-bone contact. Given that Minimal Clinically Important Differences in shoulder sROM can be small (external rotation = 3°, abduction = 7°, flexion = 12°), even subtle changes may meaningfully impact outcomes. The purpose of this study was to characterize simulated virtual passive sROM in a series of clinically planned rTSA cases while varying liner constraint. Methods: Clinically planned and performed rTSA cases by a single surgeon (R.U.H.) between August 2020 and September 2024 were analyzed using Blueprint software. For each case, polyethylene liner constraint was varied (45%, 55%, and 65%) while all other implant parameters were held constant. Cases indicated for diagnoses without significant osteophytes (massive rotator cuff tear, avascular necrosis, or rheumatoid arthritis), as well as rotator cuff tear arthropathy cases without osteophytes, were included. For each simulation, the mechanism responsible for impingement at each end-sROM was visually determined and recorded. The primary outcome was simulated passive sROM in 6 planes. Post hoc multiple comparisons were performed using the Tukey procedure. Results: Seventy-three cases were included in the final analysis. Polyethylene-to-bone impingement occurred most frequently during simulated internal rotation, adduction, and external rotation. Increasing liner constraint from 45% to 65% significantly reduced sROM in internal rotation, external rotation, adduction, and flexion (Δ = 25.0°, 23.3°, 13.8°, 12.2°, respectively). Smaller interval increases in constraint (45% to 55% and 55% to 65%) also resulted in significant reductions in sROM across multiple planes. In 50 cases, increasing constraint resulted in conversion of the impingement mechanism to polyethylene-to-bone contact. This transition was associated with reductions in sROM of up to 177°, with a mean reduction of 58.7°. Discussion: sROM was most frequently affected, and to a greater magnitude, in adduction, external rotation, and internal rotation. Increasing constraint resulted in a distinct mechanical phenomenon, which we termed "LIMIT (Liner-Induced Mechanical Impingement Transition)." LIMIT describes the conversion of impingement type to polyethylene-to-bone as constraint increases. This occurred in 50 cases and was associated with substantial reductions in sROM, particularly in abduction, flexion, and extension. Increased constraint may contribute to scapular notching through heightened impingement during external rotation, internal rotation, and adduction. Importantly, reductions in sROM exceeded the Minimal Clinically Important Difference in external rotation and flexion, suggesting clinical relevance.

Indexed as

Implant design and positioningPolyethylene liner constraintProsthetic impingementRange of motion (ROM) simulationReverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA)Scapular notching

Identifiers

PMID42729306
PMCPMC13562081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.