ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Hemoptysis risk in hospitalized patients with bronchiectasis: development and external validation of a clinical prediction model.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hemoptysis is a complication of bronchiectasis, but risk prediction in hospitalized patients remains insufficiently characterized. Existing bronchiectasis severity scores were developed to predict mortality, hospitalization, or exacerbations rather than hemoptysis. We aimed to develop and externally validate a model for in-hospital hemoptysis risk and interpret its predictors within prespecified clinical domains. Methods: This retrospective two-center study included 320 hospitalized adults with bronchiectasis. The derivation cohort comprised 215 patients from the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, and the external validation cohort comprised 105 patients from Shijiazhuang People's Hospital. Hemoptysis was the primary outcome. Candidate predictors were prespecified according to clinical relevance, clinical-domain representation, and consistency of definition and availability across centers. A core logistic regression model included age, sex, smoking history, asthma, serum albumin, hemoglobin, and log10(BNP/NT-proBNP+1); a prespecified secondary model additionally included chronic bronchitis. Discrimination, calibration, risk stratification, decision-curve analysis, and bootstrap validation were assessed. Results: Hemoptysis occurred in 55 of 215 patients (25.6%) in the derivation cohort and 36 of 105 patients (34.3%) in the validation cohort. In the core model, higher serum albumin was independently associated with hemoptysis (odds ratio per 5-g/L increase, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.29-2.94), whereas asthma showed an inverse association (odds ratio, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.06-0.51). These associations were observational and should not be interpreted as causal or protective. The core model achieved an AUC of 0.747 in the derivation cohort and 0.820 in external validation, with a Brier score of 0.177. Bootstrap validation yielded an optimism-corrected AUC of 0.707. The bronchitis-extended model achieved AUCs of 0.763 and 0.746, respectively. Across low-, intermediate-, and high-risk tertiles of the core model, observed hemoptysis rates were 2.9%, 34.3%, and 65.7%. Calibration drift was evident in the low-risk group, where the mean predicted probability was 21.4% compared with an observed rate of 2.9%. Conclusion: The core model showed good discrimination and risk stratification for in-hospital hemoptysis in bronchiectasis. The findings support a clinical-domain interpretation of bleeding susceptibility, while the albumin association should be regarded as observational. Because absolute risk was overestimated in the low-risk range, multicenter validation and local recalibration are required before probability-based clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.